Please wait a minute...

大连海洋大学学报  2019, Vol. 34 Issue (1): 109-118    DOI: 10.16535/j.cnki.dlhyxb.2019.01.016
  |
易逝期干露对菲律宾蛤仔活品净化及贮藏特性的影响
刘慧慧1,刘俊荣1,田元勇1,李亚烜1,冷寒冰1,于笛2
1.大连海洋大学 食品科学与工程学院,辽宁 大连 116023; 2.辽宁省海洋水产科学研究院,辽宁 大连 116023
Effects of emersion in crucial perishable period on Manila clam Ruditapes philippinarum depuration and live storage
LIU Hui-hui1, LIU Jun-rong1, TIAN Yuan-yong1, LI Ya-xuan1, LENG Han-bing1, YU Di2
1.College of Food Science and Engineering, Dalian Ocean University, Dalian 116023, China; 2.Liaoning Ocean and Fisheries Science Research Institute, Dalian 116023, China
下载:  HTML  PDF (2675KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 为探究菲律宾蛤仔Ruditapes philippinarum采捕后可容忍的干露时间,以研究干露对净化及随后的活品贮藏特性的影响,将采捕后的蛤仔原料设置6个处理组,分别为湿藏对照组(CW)、干藏对照组(CD)和干露0、1、3、4 d组(即E0、E1、E3、E4组),湿藏及净化条件均为室温海水,干露及干藏条件均为4 ℃湿布覆盖,分析各组的存活率、三磷酸腺苷(ATP)含量、核苷酸能荷(AEC)值和K值,并对各组蛤仔从外观、气味、滋味、质地和回味5个方面进行风味品质评价。结果表明:干露3 d内蛤仔有近100%的存活率,4 d干露存活率仍可保持90%左右,与初始原料相比,干露静置后的蛤仔均呈现恢复态势,E1、E3和E4组具有相同的ATP、AECK值水平,蛤仔呈现非愉悦性特征(苦、腥、土),经1~3 d静置后恢复了愉悦特征(甜、鲜、咸、香),干露4 d时则呈现臭味特征;原料经1、3、4 d干露,净化后蛤仔存活率分别为100%、91%和85%,随着干露时间的延长,净化过程ATP消耗增加,E4组的K值高于其他组,AEC值则未发现明显差异;感官评价结果显示,2 d内干露处理的净化产品具有良好的风味品质,而3 d以上的干露会导致风味下降,而E4组依然突出臭味;7 d活品湿藏的E0和E1组均具90%以上的存活率,E3组存活率在70%以上,而E4组存活率急剧下降至0;干藏下的E0、E1组同样具有90%以上的存活率,E3、E4组则可维持80%以上的存活率;E3、E4组在活品贮藏阶段的K值明显高于E0和E1组,除E4湿藏组外,其他所有组均呈现相同的ATP和AEC值平稳水平,而E4组则明显下降;此外,2 d内湿藏的E0、E1、E3组均可呈现愉悦特征;干藏的E0和E1组同样具有愉悦风味,E3组风味开始下降,E4组则突出臭味。研究表明,易逝期的菲律宾蛤仔品质可恢复,期间原料可容忍的干露期限是冷却条件下2 d左右,该阶段的干露暂存或运输不会影响后续的活品净化,且无论是干藏还是湿藏均具有7 d的活品货架期。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
刘慧慧
刘俊荣
田元勇
李亚烜
冷寒冰
于笛
关键词:  菲律宾蛤仔  易逝期  干露  净化  活品贮藏    
Abstract: The effects of emersion on depuration and storage properties of live Ruditapes philippinarum with shell length of (3.26±0.38)cm were studied to explore the tolerable emersion time.Survival, levels of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) related compounds, nucleotide energy charge(AEC) value, K value and sensory attributes were investigated in live Manila clam held in marine water (wet storage, group CW) at room temperature, covered by wet cloth (dry storage, group CD)storage at 4 ℃,and exposed to air for 0 d (group E0), 1(group E1), 3(group E3), and 4 d(group 4E) storaged in a refrigerating cabinet at 4 ℃.Sensory assessment of Manila clam quality was carried out using 5 sensory profiles including appearance, odor, taste,texture and aftertaste by a trained clam sensory panel.Results showed that the survival rate was nearly 100% in the clam in group E3,and about 90% in group E4, with recovery of the clam.The clam in groups E1, E3 and E4 had the same levels of ATP, AEC and K value, higher than the raw, with unpleasant descriptors (bitter, fishy, earthy).After 1-3 day-standing in the air, however, the pleasant descriptors (sweet, fresh, salty and aroma) dominated the flavor profiles, and spoilage odors appeared in group E4.The depurated clams had survival rate of 100% in group E1,91% in group E3, and 85% in group E4.ATP depletion, was found with the increase in air exposure, and K value in depurated clam in group E4 was different from other treatments during depuration, without significant difference in AEC value among the treatments.Sensory evaluation revealed that depurated clams in 2 day-emersion present favorite flavor, and that umami, sweet, pleasant odor and other pleasant descriptors appeared in group E0, and group E1.However, the flavors tended to decline, and unpleasant descriptors, even spoilage odors, were observed in the clam in group E3, and group E4.For 7-day live wet storage, there were survival of some 90% in the clam in group E0 and group E1, up to 70% in group E3, and 0% in group E4.As the 7-day live dry storage, however, survival rate of 90% was found in the clam in group E0 and group E1, and 80% in group E3 and group E4.There were significantly higher K value in groups E3 and E4 than those in groups E0 and E1 during all live storage groups.The same levels of ATP and AEC values were found in all treatments exception for group E4 in which levels of ATP and AEC values were decreased.The pleasant descriptors were fund in groups E0, E1 and E3 in the 2 day wet storage.For the dry storage, however, pleasant flavor was stil kept in groups E0 and E1, and off flavor appeared in group E3, worse with spoilage odors in group E4.In summary, the recovery of the clams occurred during the crucial perishable period, the tolerable emersion time of raw material is around 2 days under the cooling conditions, in which period, handling, landing and transit under air exposure condition will not compromise the shelf-life of live products, whether it is dry or wet storage, with a shelf life of 7 days.
Key words:  Ruditapes philippinarum    crucial perishable period    emersion    depuration    live storage
               出版日期:  2019-02-15      发布日期:  2019-05-05      期的出版日期:  2019-02-15
中图分类号:  S984  
引用本文:    
刘慧慧, 刘俊荣, 田元勇, 李亚烜, 冷寒冰, 于笛. 易逝期干露对菲律宾蛤仔活品净化及贮藏特性的影响[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2019, 34(1): 109-118.
LIU Hui-hui, LIU Jun-rong, TIAN Yuan-yong, LI Ya-xuan, LENG Han-bing, YU Di. Effects of emersion in crucial perishable period on Manila clam Ruditapes philippinarum depuration and live storage. Journal of Dalian Ocean University, 2019, 34(1): 109-118.
链接本文:  
https://xuebao.dlou.edu.cn/CN/10.16535/j.cnki.dlhyxb.2019.01.016  或          https://xuebao.dlou.edu.cn/CN/Y2019/V34/I1/109
[1] 李宁, 聂鸿涛, 黎强, 霍忠明, 闫喜武. 低温胁迫对不同群体菲律宾蛤仔存活率及脂肪酸代谢相关基因SCD、FAD 和ACC表达的影响[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2022, 37(4): 636-642.
[2] 梁腾, 李金龙, 马斌, 车宗豪, 王海生, 罗星红, 金燕, 赵侠, 丁鉴锋, 霍忠明, 滕军, 毛东亮, 翟介明, 闫喜武. “莱州红”菲律宾蛤仔家系建立及生长性状遗传参数估计[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2022, 37(2): 258-267.
[3] 徐嘉波, 施永海, 刘永士. 淡水池塘养殖尾水处理系统对氮磷的净化效果[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2022, 37(1): 104-112.
[4] 曲秦坤, 刘俊荣, 赵前, 周进, 田元勇, 徐昙烨. 基于品质易逝期的模拟中转基地处置对凡纳滨对虾活品和锁鲜品贮藏稳定性的影响[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2022, 37(1): 148-156.
[5] 杨晴晴, 金祎雯, 李伟, 赵菲, 孔亮, 佟长青. 基于蛋白质组学的菲律宾蛤仔凝集素MCL-T抑制腐败希瓦氏菌机理研究[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2021, 36(4): 653-660.
[6] 徐昙烨, 田元勇, 李亚烜, 刘俊荣. 基于UPLC-MS方法的品质易逝期活品虾夷扇贝代谢组学研究[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2021, 36(4): 637-645.
[7] 王珺, 梁腾, 王化敏, 闫喜武, 丁鉴锋, . 菲律宾蛤仔硒依赖性谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶基因克隆、表达及其对脂多糖和肽聚糖的刺激响应[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2021, 36(1): 30-37.
[8] 谢辉亮, 徐钢春, 王裕玉, 徐跑. “流水养殖槽—虾—蟹”串联式循环水养殖模式净化效能的研究[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2021, 36(1): 118-126.
[9] 谭月, 邱明, 李金龙, 左陆雅, 吴婉婷, 霍忠明, 闫喜武, . 基于线粒体16S rRNA基因序列的中日朝菲律宾蛤仔野生群体遗传多样性分析[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2021, 36(1): 127-134.
[10] 李亚烜, 刘俊荣, 刘洋, 闫丽新, 王选飞, 徐昙烨, 田元勇. 易逝期胁迫强度对虾夷扇贝活力可恢复性的影响[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2020, 35(5): 733-740.
[11] 潘澜澜, 蒋洁兰, 曲敏, 母刚, 薛占枫, 黄代钰, 张宁, 张国琛. 不同温度和密封包装的活体菲律宾蛤仔理化和感官指标变化及货架期预测[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2020, 35(4): 591-598.
[12] 刘文博, 张寒冰, 李秀辰, 张国琛, 张倩, 屈蜀光, 高敬宇, 樊博, 母刚. 面向机械化播苗的菲律宾蛤仔幼苗生物力学特性分析[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2020, 35(3): 455-461.
[13] 李金龙, 刘越, 车宗豪, 田园, 刘杰, 闫喜武、, 霍忠明、. 菲律宾蛤仔中国莱州群体与朝鲜新义州群体杂交子代早期生长发育[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2020, 35(2): 190-196.
[14] 刘洋, 李亚烜, 徐美禄, 田元勇, 刘俊荣. 糖代谢关键酶活性指示的虾夷扇贝活品品质变化[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2019, 34(5): 704-709.
[15] 夏玉秀, 申旭红, 任爽宁, 于士翔, 刘峰, 纪元. 不同干露条件单环刺螠的耐受性及对体表黏液特性的影响[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2019, 34(4): 538-544.
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed