Please wait a minute...

大连海洋大学学报  2022, Vol. 37 Issue (1): 148-156    DOI: 10.16535/j.cnki.dlhyxb.2021-094
  |
基于品质易逝期的模拟中转基地处置对凡纳滨对虾活品和锁鲜品贮藏稳定性的影响
曲秦坤,刘俊荣,赵前,周进,田元勇,徐昙烨
大连海洋大学 食品科学与工程学院,辽宁 大连 116023
Effects of quality-determination-period handling in collection and distribution center on storage stability of farmed live and freshness-locked Pacific white leg shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei
QU Qinkun,LIU Junrong*,ZHAO Qian,ZHOU Jin,TIAN Yuanyong,XU Tanye
College of Food Science and Engineering,Dalian Ocean University,Dalian 116023,China
下载:  HTML  PDF (4647KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 为改变小型分散对虾养殖产区的渔后被动现状,以大连地区池塘养殖凡纳滨对虾Litopenaeus vannamei为研究对象(体质量为20~25 g),模拟构建一个在产区具有集散性质的中转基地,将离水后的品质管理分为两个阶段,塘头至中转基地(品质易逝期)和中转基地进入鲜活品贮运销售阶段(后品质易逝期),塘头至中转基地设置为4 h无水保湿运输,中转基地处置分复水活品组和冰卒锁鲜组,随后进入贮运环节,活品组保活贮藏60 h,锁鲜组覆冰冷藏132 h,并检测不同阶段对虾肌肉白度、pH、糖原、ATP及其关联物、蛋白溶解度、琥珀酸脱氢酶(SDH)及活体血糖等指标。结果表明:品质易逝期处置对活品的可恢复性试验显示,无水运输后活体肌肉的pH和ATP值略有上升,血糖与糖原含量则略有下降,复水后的血糖、pH、糖原及ATP及其关联物等各项指标分析结果均表明活体活力恢复,随后的活品贮运期间,活体在初期呈现一定的稳定性,36 h后快速下降且出现大批量死亡;品质易逝期锁鲜处置的延迟效应试验显示,无水运输后直接进行冰卒随后冰藏,锁鲜品在销售过程中其糖原、ATP等含量虽有所下降,但前108 h期间下降速度较慢,pH始终维持在7.98以下,呈现了5 d的锁鲜品货架期,锁鲜品各项指标均高于活品,这表明易逝期处置能够有效地实施锁鲜,延缓了鲜品贮藏期间品质的下降速度。研究表明,离水后对虾具有一个品质易逝期,且对后品质易逝期有延迟效应,水产品产区建立中转基地可以有效地实施易逝期品质调控并可主动实施产品设计,进而改变小型分散养殖产业渔后被动现状。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
曲秦坤
刘俊荣
赵前
周进
田元勇
徐昙烨
关键词:  凡纳滨对虾  品质易逝期  中转基地  活品  锁鲜品  贮藏稳定性    
Abstract: To reconstruct less organized local shrimp supply chains for scattered shrimp-farming operations areas,a post-harvest handling center (PHHC)around production area was designed with operations of collection and distribution of local pond-farmed Pacific white leg shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei with body mass of 20-25 g.Shrimp supply chain was divided into two stages,from pond-farmed to PHHC for 4 h wet transportation as the quality-determination-period (QDP),and from PHHC to markets as the post quality-determination-period (P-QDP).The products in the PHHC were divided into two groups:the rewatered live product group and the freshness-locked product group,and then entered the storage and transportation link.The live product group was kept alive for 60 hours,while the freshness-locked group was iced cold storage for 132 hours.The detection indices included muscle whiteness,pH,glycogen,ATP related compound,protein solubility and SDH (succinate dehydrogenase)as well as glucose as an indicator of fitness of live shrimp.The recoverability of QDP-treatment to live product revealed that pH and ATP content of live products muscle were increased slightly,while the glucose and glycogen contents were decreased slightly after waterless transportation.The analysis of glucose,pH,glycogen and ATP related compound was recovery after rehydration.During the subsequent storage and transportation of live products,the live products showed to some extent stability at the initial stage,and then rapid decrease and a high mortality was observed after 36 hours,with delayed effect of fresh-locked treatment during QDP.The glycogen and ATP contents of the iced collection were decreased somewhat during the sales process,with the slow decline rate during the first 108 h,and the pH value always remained below 7.98,presenting a 5 d shelf life of the freshness-locked products.It was worth noting that the indices of freshness-locked were all higher than those of live products,indicating that the perishable period disposal effectively implemented freshness-locking and delayed the quality decline rate of fresh products during storage.Pacific white leg shrimp had a QDP after waterless,and had a delayed effect on the P-QDP after waterless.The findings indicated that the establishment of post-harvest handling center effectively implemented quality control in the QDP and actively implemented product design,thus changing the passive status of small scattered aquaculture industry after harvesting,and that improved the economic income of fishermen,which provided high-quality prawn products for the market.
Key words:  Litopenaeus vannamei    quality determination period    post-harvest handling center    live product;freshness-locked product    storage stability
               出版日期:  2022-03-14      发布日期:  2022-03-14      期的出版日期:  2022-03-14
中图分类号:  S 983  
基金资助: 国家重点研发计划“蓝色粮仓科技创新”项目 (2018YFD0901001);辽宁省自然科学基金(2020-MS-280)
引用本文:    
曲秦坤, 刘俊荣, 赵前, 周进, 田元勇, 徐昙烨. 基于品质易逝期的模拟中转基地处置对凡纳滨对虾活品和锁鲜品贮藏稳定性的影响[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2022, 37(1): 148-156.
QU Qinkun, LIU Junrong, ZHAO Qian, ZHOU Jin, TIAN Yuanyong, XU Tanye. Effects of quality-determination-period handling in collection and distribution center on storage stability of farmed live and freshness-locked Pacific white leg shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. Journal of Dalian Ocean University, 2022, 37(1): 148-156.
链接本文:  
https://xuebao.dlou.edu.cn/CN/10.16535/j.cnki.dlhyxb.2021-094  或          https://xuebao.dlou.edu.cn/CN/Y2022/V37/I1/148
[1] 朱昱铮, 申亮, 郭冉, 荆冰妍, 梁倍宁, 高佳朋. 鱼肽和蛋白酶替代部分鱼粉对凡纳滨对虾生长、消化酶及肠道菌群的影响[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2022, 37(5): 756-763.
[2] 戚瑞荣, 唐绍林, 张吉鹏, 崔龙波, 马家好. 凡纳滨对虾气泡病的组织病理学观察[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2021, 36(6): 952-958.
[3] 赵锡蝶, 郑海玲, 刘明明, 汤雨, 乔秀亭, 刘群, 黄宗海, 程镇燕. 豆粕替代鱼粉并添加有机酸对凡纳滨对虾生长、免疫和肠道菌群的影响[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2021, 36(6): 966-975.
[4] 赵前, 周进, 刘俊荣, 徐昙烨, 田元勇. 水产品鲜活品质评价体系研究进展[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2021, 36(4): 706-.
[5] 徐昙烨, 田元勇, 李亚烜, 刘俊荣. 基于UPLC-MS方法的品质易逝期活品虾夷扇贝代谢组学研究[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2021, 36(4): 637-645.
[6] 李春艳, 白晓慧, 刘义, 张振国, 张丽, 刘克明, 郝爽, 罗璋, 尤宏争. 致病性副溶血弧菌VP0630株的分离鉴定及其对凡纳滨对虾免疫酶活力的影响[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2020, 35(4): 502-508.
[7] 徐美禄, 冷寒冰, 李亚烜, 刘 洋, 田元勇, 刘俊荣. 捕后干藏-复水处理对太平洋牡蛎活品贮藏稳定性的影响[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2019, 34(6): 828-833.
[8] 刘慧慧, 刘俊荣, 田元勇, 李亚烜, 冷寒冰, 于笛. 易逝期干露对菲律宾蛤仔活品净化及贮藏特性的影响[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2019, 34(1): 109-118.
[9] 杨品贤, 贾高旺, 夏辉, 齐国山, 李雪鹤, 路晶晶, 张宇, 郭冉. 投喂频率和糖源组成对凡纳滨对虾糖代谢的影响[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2018, 33(5): 583-588.
[10] 周晏琳, 郑尧, 刘慧慧, 张晴, 宋扬, 田元勇, 刘俊荣. 干露对活品虾夷扇贝闭壳肌SOD酶活性及其性质的影响[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2018, 33(5): 651-657.
[11] 王博雅, 王力, 刘美如, 叶仕根, 黎睿君, 李华, 李强. 凡纳滨对虾3种主要病毒和虾肝肠胞虫在辽宁地区的流行情况分析[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2017, 32(2): 150-154.
[12] 郑尧, 刘俊荣, 周晏琳, 刘慧慧, 宋扬, 田元勇, 赵学伟. 捕后虾夷扇贝闭壳肌免疫因子与活品品质评价初探[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2017, 32(2): 217-223.
[13] 高欣, 景泓杰, 赵文, 孟凡明, 郭长江, 刘青. 凡纳滨对虾高位养殖池塘浮游生物群落结构及水质特征[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2017, 32(1): 44-50.
[14] 姚洪, 张吉鹏, 杨川, 张利娟, 朴元植, 刘月芬, 叶仕根, 李华. 辽宁一例凡纳滨对虾大规模死亡的病原研究[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2016, 31(3): 256-260.
[15] 李涛, 黄建华, 马振华, 杨其彬, 周发林, 杨丽诗, 江世贵. 4种国外引进品系凡纳滨对虾养殖效果的研究[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2016, 31(1): 71-74.
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed