Please wait a minute...

大连海洋大学学报  2018, Vol. 33 Issue (6): 795-801    DOI: 10.16535/j.cnki.dlhyxb.2018.06.018
  |
不同温度及气体条件对密封包装海湾扇贝活品品质的影响
潘澜澜12林成新2张国琛1曲敏3杨晓桐1母刚1路婷婷1高晓晴1
1.大连海洋大学 机械与动力工程学院辽宁 大连 116023;2.大连海事大学 交通运输装备与海洋工程学院辽宁 大连 116026;3.大连海洋大学 食品科学与工程学院辽宁 大连 116023
Effects of temperature and gas conditions on quality of live bay scallop Argopecten irradians sealed package
PAN Lan-lan1,2, LIN Cheng-xin2, ZHANG Guo-chen1, QU Min3, YANG Xiao-tong1, MU Gang1, LU Ting-ting1,GAO Xiao-qing1
1.College of Mechanical and Power Engineering, Dalian Ocean University, Dalian 116023, China; 2.College of Transport Equipment and Ocean Engineering, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China;3.College of Food Science and Engineering, Dalian Ocean University, Dalian 116023, China
下载:  HTML  PDF (731KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 为延长海湾扇贝Argopecten irradians活品贮运过程中的存活期,将净化暂养后的海湾扇贝在生态冰温(0 ℃)及低温(5 ℃)条件下采用真空、充氧、空气3种密封包装,探讨了不同包装方式及温度对海湾扇贝活品品质的影响。结果表明:3种密封包装的海湾扇贝,在0 ℃条件下保存比在5 ℃条件下能更有效地延长存活时间和提升感官品质,尤其3 d时0 ℃条件下的菌落总数增长速率明显缓于5 ℃时,温度条件对海湾扇贝品质影响明显;0 ℃条件下,充氧包装的海湾扇贝无水保活效果最好,第11天时扇贝出现死亡,第15天时全部死亡,其感官评价分值在5 d内接近满分;真空包装的海湾扇贝,第4天时出现死亡,第7天时全部死亡,其死亡时质量失重率为16.65%,色度差为1.68%,糖原含量为6.41 mg/g,虽然其质量失重率、色度差和糖原变化保持较好,但其感官评价3 d后分值下降明显。综合各指标变化,0 ℃充氧包装有利于延长海湾扇贝的存活期,能够有效保持海湾扇贝活品品质,本研究结果可为活品海湾扇贝密封包装保活保鲜技术提供数据参考。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
潘澜澜
林成新
张国琛
曲敏
杨晓桐
母刚
路婷婷
高晓晴
关键词:  獐子岛  人工鱼礁  渔业资源  渔业声学评估  空间分布    
Abstract: The bay scallopArgopecten irradians cleaned and temporary holding were packed by vacuum sealing, oxygenation or aeration at 0 ℃ and 5 ℃ to investigate effects of different temperatures and gas conditions on the quality of sealed package live bay scallop, and to prolong the survival time and maintain the quality of bay scallop during storage and transportation. The results showed that the scallop treated at 0 ℃ had longer survival period and higher sensory quality than the scallop treated by all three forms of packaging at 5 ℃ did. The bacteria were found to grow significantly slower in the scallop stored at temperature of 0 ℃ for 3 d than that at 5 ℃, indicating the effect of temperature on the scallop quality. In oxygen packaging, the first death was observed in 11 day storage, and all scallop were died in 15 day storage with total bacteria density of 5.9 lg(CFU/g). The sensory evaluation of the oxygen packaging was all close to the maximum score from start to the fifth day. In vacuum packaging, the first death was observed in 4 day storage, and all scallops was died in 7 day storage with total bacteria density of 3.9 lg(CFU/g). The weight loss ratio reduced was found to be 16.65%, the chromaticity difference 1.68% and glycogen to be reduced to 6.41 mg/g in death scallop in vacuum packaging, all of the three indices being better than that in oxygen packaging and air packaging in the same time. The scores of sensory evaluation, however, were dropped significantly 3 d after treatment, indicating that vacuum packaging only maintains the quality for a short period. It is concluded that the sealed packaging with oxygen at 0 ℃ was more conductive to prolonging survival period and keeping the quality of live scallop. The finding provides references with the preservation of live scallop by controlling the sealing way and temperature.
Key words:  Argopecten irradians    sealed package    quality    survival rate
                    发布日期:  2018-12-15      期的出版日期:  2018-12-15
中图分类号:  S98  
引用本文:    
潘澜澜, 林成新, 张国琛, 曲敏, 杨晓桐, 母刚, 路婷婷, 高晓晴. 不同温度及气体条件对密封包装海湾扇贝活品品质的影响[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2018, 33(6): 795-801.
PAN Lan-lan, LIN Cheng-xin, ZHANG Guo-chen, QU Min, YANG Xiao-tong, MU Gang, LU Ting-ting, GAO Xiao-qing. Effects of temperature and gas conditions on quality of live bay scallop Argopecten irradians sealed package. Journal of Dalian Ocean University, 2018, 33(6): 795-801.
链接本文:  
https://xuebao.dlou.edu.cn/CN/10.16535/j.cnki.dlhyxb.2018.06.018  或          https://xuebao.dlou.edu.cn/CN/Y2018/V33/I6/795
[1] 鲁泉, 王超, 方舟, 张柏豪, 李楠, 陈新军. 基于文献计量的渔业资源可持续利用评价研究进展[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2022, 37(5): 873-883.
[2] 沈璐, 张年华, 田涛, 洪鹤轩. 3D打印混凝土人工鱼礁的生物附着效果[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2022, 37(4): 584-591.
[3] 张年华, 田涛, 沈璐, 杨军, 吴忠鑫, 刘敏, 高东奎, 尹增强. 人工鱼礁建礁材料研究应用进展[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2022, 37(2): 352-.
[4] 徐田振, 徐东坡, 周彦锋, 景丽, 葛优, 张晏江, 赵立祥, 刘鹏飞. 淮河入海通道及其附近水系鱼类群落空间分布格局[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2020, 35(6): 914-921.
[5] 谷德贤, 王婷, 徐海龙, 王娜, 吴宁, 李文雯, 刘国山. 天津海域鱼卵、仔稚鱼资源动态研究[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2020, 35(4): 557-563.
[6] 席杨, 田涛, 杨军, 吴忠鑫, 刘敏, 高东奎, 陈勇. 许氏平鲉幼鱼在不同流场环境下的趋礁行为研究[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2020, 35(3): 399-406.
[7] 白禄军, 张子媛, 王利, 周波波, 李毅超, 邵旭东, 苏珊, 刘青. 响水水库浮游生物渔业资源分析[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2020, 35(2): 280-287.
[8] 李磊, 陈栋, 彭建新, 张建明, 王磊, 陈帅, 全为民, 蒋玫, 姜亚洲. 不同人工鱼礁模型对黑棘鲷、中国花鲈和大黄鱼的诱集效果比较[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2019, 34(3): 413-418.
[9] 毕宏宇, 明红霞, 马悦欣, 苏洁, 孙志浩, 王艳涛, 金媛, 樊景凤. 大连典型娱乐海水浴场重要病原细菌筛选及其在不同介质中的分布[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2019, 34(2): 204-213.
[10] 张虎, 黄昕, 胡海生, 贲成恺, 吉红九, 于雯雯, 袁健美, 汤晓鸿, 高继先. 江苏省近岸海域鳗苗网兼捕对渔业资源损害性的初步研究[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2019, 34(1): 119-125.
[11] 刘心媚, 郑艳娜, 陈昌平, 刘昌凤. 框架型与沉箱型人工鱼礁绕流特性的数值模拟[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2019, 34(1): 133-138.
[12] 汪雷, 徐东坡. 长江下游狼山沙和新开沙水域渔业资源群落结构特征分析[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2018, 33(1): 86-94.
[13] 李斌, 汤勇, 孙建富, 李佩杰, 胡亚东, 张剑波. 基于声学方法的黄河三门峡水库渔业资源空间分布研究[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2016, 31(5): 563-571.
[14] 张雪, 栾青杉, 孙坚强, 杜美荣, 梁峻, 臧有才, 张媛, 王俊. 獐子岛海域浮游植物群落周年变化及其与环境因子的关系[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2016, 31(3): 315-323.
[15] 刘永虎, 程前, 田涛, 陈勇, 尹增强, 刘汉超, 王月. 大连獐子岛人工鱼礁海域夏季水质变化与评价[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2016, 31(3): 331-337.
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed