Please wait a minute...

大连海洋大学学报  2017, Vol. 32 Issue (1): 93-98    DOI: 10.16535/j.cnki.dlhyxb.2017.01.016
  |
海州湾生态修复效果评价
符小明,唐建业,吴卫强,张硕
1.上海海洋大学海洋科学学院,上海201306;2.大洋渔业资源可持续开发省部共建教育部重点实验室,上海201306;3.连云港市海洋与渔业局,江苏连云港222003
Evaluation of ecological restoration performance in Haizhou Bay,Lianyungang
FU Xiao-ming,TANG Jian-ye,WU Wei-qiang,ZHANG Shuo
1.College of Marine Sciences,Shanghai Ocean University,Shanghai 201306,China;2.Key Laboratory of Sustainable Exploitation of Oceanic Fisheries Resources,Ministry of Education,Shanghai Ocean University,Shanghai 201306,China;3.Lianyungang Marine and Fishery Bureau,Lianyungang 222003,China
下载:  PDF (417KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 为评价海州湾生态修复工程实施的效果,在分析2014年春、夏、秋3个季节本底调查数据的基础上,以 “资源—环境”作为准则层,共筛选16项具体的评价因子建立生态修复效果评价指标体系,并用德尔菲法和熵权法组合赋权,通过效用函数估算海州湾生态修复治理目标的实现程度。结果表明:通过投放人工鱼礁,海州湾生态修复率达到30.14%,其中,生物资源平均修复率为17.96%,海洋环境平均修复率为33.15%,生态修复治理目标综合值为0.400 2,综合修复等级为中等。研究表明,海州湾生态修复工程对水质环境的改善效果较为明显,但对生物资源的恢复效果还有待进一步提高。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
符小明
唐建业
吴卫强
张硕
关键词:  海州湾  生态修复  效果评估    
Abstract: A set of ecological restoration effect evaluation system was established based on“resource-environment”with 16 concrete evaluation factors and evaluation method by the marine environment ecological survey in spring, summer and autumn of 2014 and the performance of ecological restoration and governance of Haizhou Bay ecological restoration project was assessed using Delphi method and entropy weight method combination empowerment.Results showed that the conditions of the ecological restoration areas were found to be improved by 30.14%,with mean repair rate of 17.96%in biological resources and 33.15%in marine environment improvement.There was comprehensive evolution value of 0.400 2 in ecological restoration in the Haizhou Bay,up to the moderate level.The findings indicated that environmental remediation was obvious,but marine biological resources recovery needed to be further improved in Haizhou Bay areas.
Key words:  Haizhou Bay    ecological restoration    performance evaluation
               出版日期:  2017-02-21      发布日期:  2022-08-23      期的出版日期:  2017-02-21
中图分类号:  S953.1  
基金资助: 国家公益性行业 (农业)科研专项 (201303047);海州湾海洋牧场示范项目 (D-8006-12-0018,D8006-15-8014)
引用本文:    
符小明, 唐建业, 吴卫强, 张硕. 海州湾生态修复效果评价[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2017, 32(1): 93-98.
FU Xiao-ming, TANG Jian-ye, WU Wei-qiang, ZHANG Shuo. Evaluation of ecological restoration performance in Haizhou Bay,Lianyungang. Journal of Dalian Ocean University, 2017, 32(1): 93-98.
链接本文:  
https://xuebao.dlou.edu.cn/CN/10.16535/j.cnki.dlhyxb.2017.01.016  或          https://xuebao.dlou.edu.cn/CN/Y2017/V32/I1/93
[1] 张明亮. 滨海盐沼湿地退化机制及生态修复技术研究进展[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2022, 37(4): 539-549.
[2] 阙延福, 胥贤, 徐念, 黄晋, 李伟涛, 熊美华, 李红涛, 朱滨. 基于微卫星标记的唇䱻亲子亲子鉴定技术研究[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2019, 34(5): 643-648.
[3] 高春梅, 郑伊汝, 张硕. 海州湾海洋牧场沉积物-水界面营养盐交换通量的研究[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2016, 31(1): 95-102.
[4] 吉玮, 朱文菊, 李超, 毕建涛. 基于多重分形理论的海州湾海底地形构建[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2014, 29(6): 659-663.
[5] 狄欢, 张硕, 钱卫国. 海州湾海洋牧场区表层沉积物主要理化状况及其相关性分析[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2013, 28(4): 406-412.
[6] 卢璐, 张硕, 赵裕青, 张虎, 向再晨. 海州湾人工鱼礁海域沉积物中重金属生态风险的分析[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2011, 26(2): 126-132.
[7] 张硕, 朱孔文, 孙满昌. 海州湾人工鱼礁区浮游植物的种类组成和生物量[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2006, 21(2): 134-140.
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed