Please wait a minute...

大连海洋大学学报  2023, Vol. 38 Issue (3): 414-422    DOI: 10.16535/j.cnki.dlhyxb.2022-276
  |
万峰湖丰水期和枯水期细菌群落组成和多样性比较
秦燕,范波,梅丽
兴义民族师范学院 生物与化学学院,贵州 兴义 562400
Comparative of bacterial community composition and diversity in the Wanfeng Lake between wet season and dry season
QIN Yan,FAN Bo,MEI Li
School of Biology and Chemistry,Minzu Normal University of Xingyi,Xingyi 562400,China
下载:  HTML  PDF (5480KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 为比较贵州省黔西南州万峰湖丰水期和枯水期细菌群落组成和多样性,于2020年11月(丰水期)和2021年5月(枯水期)采集了万峰湖3个生态位点(大坝、梅家湾和巴结)表层(0~5 m)水体的水样,采用16S rRNA高通量测序技术分析其群落组成。结果表明:3个取样点丰水期细菌的OTUs共1 647个,枯水期细菌的OTUs共1 530个,枯水期细菌丰度高于丰水期,而丰水期细菌群落多样性高于枯水期;在门水平上,丰水期浮游细菌群落主要由变形菌门(Proteobacteria)、放线菌门(Actinobacteria)和蓝藻门(Cyanobacteria)等18门202属细菌组成,枯水期浮游细菌群落则主要由放线菌门、变形菌门和拟杆菌门(Bacteroidetes)等20门236属细菌组成;在属水平上,丰水期和枯水期共有属为55属,147属为丰水期特有,其中放线菌门的Nanopelagicaceae属、蓝菌属(Cyanobium)和羊栖菜弧菌属(Limnohabitans)丰度最高,181属为枯水期特有,其中蓝藻门的Gplla属、土生单胞菌属(Terrimonas)和玫瑰单胞菌属(Roseomonas)丰度最高;PICRUSt功能预测显示,大部分代谢途径中菌群预测的基因拷贝数为枯水期明显高于丰水期。研究表明,万峰湖丰水期和枯水期细菌群落组成和多样性存在明显差异,丰水期和枯水期均有其特有的细菌群落结构,且枯水期菌群代谢比丰水期更活跃。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
秦燕
范波
梅丽
关键词:  万峰湖  细菌组成  16S rRNA  高通量测序  丰水期  枯水期    
Abstract: In order to compare the composition and diversity of bacterial community in wet and dry seasons of the Wanfeng Lake in Qianxian prefecture, Guizhou Province, water samples from the surface (0-5 m)of three ecological loci in the Wanfeng Lake were collected in November 2020 (wet season)and May 2021 (dry season), bacterial community composition of each sample was studied by 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing technology. The sequence diversity and abundance indices showed that there were 1 647 OTUs in the wet season and 1 530 OTUs in the dry season. The relative bacterial abundance in the dry season was higher than that in the wet season.The bacterial community diversity in the wet season was higher than that in the dry season. The species classification results showed that the planktonic bacterial community in the wet season was mainly composed of 18 phylum (Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria and Cyanobacteria, etc.), and 202 genera of bacteria. The planktonic bacterial community in the dry season is mainly composed of 20 phylum (Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes, etc.), and 236 genera of bacteria. The analysis of the genera showed that a total of 55 genera were common in both wet and dry seasons, and 147 genera were specific to the wet season, among which NanopelagicaceaeCyanobium and Limnohabitans of the Actinomycetes phylum had the higher abundance. 181 genus is specific to the dry season, with the higher abundance of GpllaTerramonas and Roseonas in the Cyanobacteria phylum. PICRUSt function prediction showed that the gene copy number in the wet season was significantly higher than that in the dry season in most metabolic pathways. The results reveal that there are significant differences in the composition and diversity of bacterial community between wet and dry seasons of the Wanfeng Lake, the wet and dry seasons have their own unique bacterial community structures, and the metabolism of bacterial community in the dry season is more active than that in the wet season.
Key words:  Wanfeng Lake    bacterial composition    16S rRNA    high-throughput sequencing    wet season    dry season
               出版日期:  2023-07-12      发布日期:  2023-07-12      期的出版日期:  2023-07-12
中图分类号:  S 917  
  Q 179.1  
基金资助: 贵州省教育厅青年科技人才成长项目(黔教合KY字【2019】221号);兴义民族师范学院博士科研基金(18XYBS02);黔西南州2019年州级科技计划自筹基金(2019-2-50)
引用本文:    
秦燕, 范波, 梅丽. 万峰湖丰水期和枯水期细菌群落组成和多样性比较[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2023, 38(3): 414-422.
QIN Yan, FAN Bo, MEI Li. Comparative of bacterial community composition and diversity in the Wanfeng Lake between wet season and dry season. Journal of Dalian Ocean University, 2023, 38(3): 414-422.
链接本文:  
https://xuebao.dlou.edu.cn/CN/10.16535/j.cnki.dlhyxb.2022-276  或          https://xuebao.dlou.edu.cn/CN/Y2023/V38/I3/414
[1] 许竟成, 林衍峰, 杨泉, 沈冰燕, 耿洪璐, 李梅, 李婷婷, 杨奥伟, 柏晓辉. 基于高通量测序的野生和养殖台湾白甲鱼皮肤细菌群落多样性分析[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2022, 37(6): 913-921.
[2] 邓茹, 陈曦, 裘丽萍, 孟顺龙, 陈家长. 基于高通量测序及Biolog-ECO方法的雄安新区鲥鯸淀细菌群落结构与功能多样性分析[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2021, 36(5): 752-759.
[3] 邱楚雯, 袁新程, 施永海, 王韩信, 谢永德, 徐嘉波, 税春. 池塘鱼菜立体种养系统的微生物群落结构分析[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2021, 36(3): 454-461.
[4] 隗陈征, 刘鹰, 任纪龙, 马洪婧, 吴英海, 韩蕊, . 曝气条件对铁基复合填料生物滤器脱氮性能及菌群变化的影响[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2021, 36(3): 470-477.
[5] 胡世康, 武海波, 王博, 秦海鹏, 廖栩峥, 赵吉臣, 何子豪, 陈燮燕, 孙成波, . 土池和高位铺膜池养殖杂交鳢肠道菌群结构的比较分析[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2021, 36(2): 303-309.
[6] 谭月, 邱明, 李金龙, 左陆雅, 吴婉婷, 霍忠明, 闫喜武, . 基于线粒体16S rRNA基因序列的中日朝菲律宾蛤仔野生群体遗传多样性分析[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2021, 36(1): 127-134.
[7] 徐晟云, 陈昆慈, 罗青, 刘海洋, 欧密, 上官清, 赵建. 基于16S rRNA高通量测序的鳢肠道微生物群落结构研究[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2020, 35(5): 693-700.
[8] 李礼, 姜海波, 姜志强, 黎明, 文明, 姚丽, 王常安, 邵俭, 袁国尚. 饲料添加杜仲皮水提物对虹鳟生长、肠道组织学及菌群多样性的影响[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2020, 35(4): 481-490.
[9] 赵文静, 许强华. 伯氏肩孔南极鱼和革首南极鱼皮肤微生物多样性的研究[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2019, 34(6): 792-797.
[10] 史东杰, 胡金有, 王赛赛, 朱华, 张欣, 朱莉飞, 孙砚胜. 红白锦鲤皮肤转录组测序分析[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2019, 34(4): 475-481.
[11] 张敏莹, 徐东坡, 方弟安, 周彦锋, 刘凯. 秀丽白虾3个地理种群mtDNA 16S rRNA基因序列变异及遗传分化[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2018, 33(3): 322-328.
[12] 聂鸿涛, 姜力文, 郑梦鸽, 李东东, 闫喜武. 大竹蛏高通量转录组测序数据组装和分析[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2017, 32(6): 658-663.
[13] 李英英, 陈曦, 宋铁英. 不同生长速度的大黄鱼肠道菌群结构的差异[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2017, 32(5): 509-513.
[14] 司滨, 王轶南, 刘海映, 曹海龙, 张建强, 吕绘倩, 孙梦蕾, 姜志强. 饲料中添加壳寡糖对刺参肠壁菌群的影响[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2017, 32(2): 167-171.
[15] 孙丕海, 钱坤, 李晓丽, 杨志平, 丁鉴锋, 孙雪莹, 马悦欣. 基于高通量测序分析海带表面细菌群落结构[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2017, 32(1): 7-12.
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed