Please wait a minute...

大连海洋大学学报  2021, Vol. 36 Issue (3): 495-502    DOI: 10.16535/j.cnki.dlhyxb.2020-193
  |
基于低场核磁共振技术对不同干燥方式的海马品质研究
吴靖娜1,2,陈晓婷3,苏永昌3,乔琨3,陈贝3,刘智禹3*
1.厦门医学院 厦门市海洋药用天然产物资源重点实验室,福建 厦门 361023; 2.厦门医学院 海洋生物医药资源福建省高校工程研究中心,福建 厦门 361023; 3.福建省水产研究所,福建 厦门 361013
Effects of different drying methods on quality of sea horse Hippocampus based on low-field nuclear magnetic resonance technology
WU Jingna1,2, CHEN Xiaoting3, SU Yongchang3, QIAO Kun3, CHEN Bei3, LIU Zhiyu3*
1.Xiamen Key Laboratory of Marine Medicinal Natural Products Resources, Xiamen Medical College, Xiamen 361023, China; 2.Fujian Universities and Colleges Engineering Research Center of Marine Biopharmaceutical Resources, Xiamen Medical College, Xiamen 361023, China; 3.Fisheries Research Institute of Fujian, Xiamen 361013, China
下载:  HTML  PDF (5800KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 为探究不同干燥方式对海马Hippocampus品质特性的影响,采用热风干燥(100 ℃)、冷风干燥(40 ℃)、真空冷冻干燥(-26~-30 ℃,0.1 kPa)和真空干燥(70 ℃,133 Pa)等方式对三斑海马Hippocampus trimaculatus(湿体质量2.5~3.0 g)进行处理,测定并分析了海马干在不同干燥方式下的干燥性能、收缩率、水分分布等指标。结果表明:不同干燥方式对三斑海马的干燥性能、收缩率有显著性影响(P<0.05),其中,热风干燥与真空干燥的耗时和耗能分别为15 h、4.03 kW·h/kg 和10 h、2.46 kW·h/kg,干燥性能较优,而真空冷冻干燥的收缩率最低;低场核磁检测结果显示,不同干燥方式的干燥过程中海马干的水分含量下降,主要是不易流动水和自由水含量降低;海马干复水过程的结果显示,不易流动水不断上升,热风干燥和真空冷冻干燥的复水速度较快。研究表明,热风干燥与真空干燥用时短,具有节能效果,而真空冷冻干燥处理的海马品质较优,复水性能较好。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
吴靖娜
陈晓婷
苏永昌
乔琨
陈贝
刘智禹
关键词:  海马  干燥  低场核磁共振技术  干燥性能  品质特性    
Abstract: In order to explore the effect of different drying methods on quality characteristics of sea horse Hippocampus, the drying performance, shrinkage rate and moisture distribution were measured and analyzed in longnose sea horse Hippocampus trimaculatus with wet body mass of 2.5-3.0 g dried by 100 ℃ hot air drying, 40 ℃ cold air drying, vacuum freeze-drying (-26--30 ℃, 0.1 kPa) and vacuum drying (70 ℃, 133 kPa). The results showed that the drying performance and shrinkage rate of longnose sea horse were significantly affected by different drying methods (P<0.05). The better drying performance was observed in hot air drying and vacuum drying, with the time consumption of 15 h, and energy consumption of 4.03 kW·h/kg in the hot air drying and 10 h, 2.46 kW·h/kg in the vacuum hot air drying, and the minimal shrinkage rate in vacuum freeze-drying. Low field nuclear magnetic resonance detection revealed that the moisture content was decreased in different drying methods, primarily due to the decrease in the content of immobilized water and free water. The change in the rehydration process of longnose sea horse showed that the immobilized water was increased continuously, and the faster rehydration speed was found in the hot air drying and vacuum freeze drying. It is concluded that drying and vacuum drying are characterized by short time and energy saving, and that the sea horse treated by vacuum freeze-drying has high quality and good rehydration performance.
Key words:   Hipocampus    drying    low field nuclear magnetic resonance    drying performance    quality characteristics
               出版日期:  2021-06-07      发布日期:  2021-06-07      期的出版日期:  2021-06-07
中图分类号:  S 986  
  TS 254  
基金资助: 福建省科技计划项目(2018R1003-10)
引用本文:    
吴靖娜, 陈晓婷, 苏永昌, 乔琨, 陈贝, 刘智禹. 基于低场核磁共振技术对不同干燥方式的海马品质研究[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2021, 36(3): 495-502.
WU Jingna, CHEN Xiaoting, SU Yongchang, QIAO Kun, CHEN Bei, LIU Zhiyu. Effects of different drying methods on quality of sea horse Hippocampus based on low-field nuclear magnetic resonance technology. Journal of Dalian Ocean University, 2021, 36(3): 495-502.
链接本文:  
https://xuebao.dlou.edu.cn/CN/10.16535/j.cnki.dlhyxb.2020-193  或          https://xuebao.dlou.edu.cn/CN/Y2021/V36/I3/495
[1] 马先英, 赵世明, 洪滨, 李秀辰, 武立波, 谢忠东. 冷风及冷风与热风联合干燥海参效果的比较研究[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2015, 30(5): 536-539.
[2] 霍锦, 张国琛, 祝春柳, 母刚, 张璐颖. 微波真空干燥江蓠的干燥特性及对蛋白质保留率的影响[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2015, 30(4): 405-409.
[3] 俞微微, 刘俊荣, 沈建, 丛海花. 扇贝闭壳肌薄层干燥的数学模型[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2015, 30(2): 211-215.
[4] 张倩, 张国琛, 母刚, 陈炜, 郑天罡. 微波真空干燥对虾夷扇贝闭壳肌营养成分的影响[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2013, 28(6): 604-609.
[5] 张国琛, 张倩, 齐妍, 母刚. 变功率微波真空间歇干燥扇贝柱的研究[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2012, 27(4): 350-354.
[6] 张国琛, 母刚, 王隽冬, 张倩. 仿刺参微波真空干燥工艺的研究[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2012, 27(2): 186-189.
[7] 叶彪, 蒋小强, 李敏, 邓锴. 真空冷冻干燥过程参数对罗非鱼片冻干时间及其除水率的影响[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2008, 23(1): 47-51.
[8] 马先英, 林艾光, 牟晨晓. 用热风与微波组合干燥胡萝卜的工艺[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2007, 22(2): 129-132.
[9] 杨弘诣, 杨为东, 赵文, 腾力平, 张国辉, 程刚. 海马病原菌的分离鉴定及其对抗生素敏感性的研究[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2006, 21(2): 131-133.
[10] 马先英, 赵世明, 林艾光. 不同干燥方法对胡萝卜复水性及品质的影响[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2006, 21(2): 158-161.
[11] 张国琛, 徐振方, 潘澜澜. 微波真空干燥技术在食品工业中的应用与展望[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2004, 19(4): 292-296.
[12] 张国琛, 牟晨晓, 潘澜澜, 徐振方. 热风干燥参数对扇贝柱干燥速度及品质的影响[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2004, 19(1): 35-39.
[13] 黄文, 杨莉, 马志宏. 噬菌蛭弧菌Bd-9五种保藏方法的比较研究[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2002, 17(4): 341-344.
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed