Please wait a minute...

大连海洋大学学报  2021, Vol. 36 Issue (1): 57-65    DOI: 10.16535/j.cnki.dlhyxb.2020-034
  |
刺参精子冷冻保存方法研究
赵谭军,尹文露,邹炀,刘丽,宋坚,常亚青,湛垚垚*
大连海洋大学 农业农村部北方海水增养殖重点实验室,辽宁 大连 116023
Cryopreservation method of sperm of sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus
ZHAO Tanjun, YIN Wenlu, ZOU Yang, LIU Li, SONG Jian, CHANG Yaqing, ZHAN Yaoyao*
Key Laboratory of Mariculture & Stock Enhancement in North China’s Sea, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs,Dalian Ocean University, Dalian 116023, China
下载:  HTML  PDF (591KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 为获得适宜的刺参Apostichopus japonicus精子冷冻保存技术,综合借鉴现有水产动物精子冷冻保存方法,对刺参精子降温方式、冷冻保存液、精子与冷冻保存液混合比例及复苏温度进行了筛选,在筛选出适宜的刺参精子降温方式基础上,分别以煮沸消毒海水和超纯水为溶剂,加入葡萄糖、NaCl、KCl、海藻糖、无水CaCl2和冷冻保存剂[二甲基亚砜(DMSO)、甘油(Gly)或1,2-丙二醇(1,2- G)]配制冷冻保存剂终体积分数为5%、10%和15%的冷冻保存液(Aj-1~Aj-27),以体积比为1∶1、1∶2和1∶3的比例混合精子与冷冻保存液进行冷冻保存,冷冻48 h后分别在37 ℃和30 ℃水浴条件下进行精子复苏,以精子活率、快速运动时间和精子寿命为指标,综合筛选冷冻保存刺参精子的适宜冷冻保存液、精子与冷冻保存液混合比例及复苏温度。结果表明:将刺参精子与以超纯水为溶剂配制的Aj-20精子冷冻保存液(12 g/L葡萄糖、7 g/L NaCl、0.7 g/L KCl、5 g/L海藻糖、0.1 g/L无水CaCl2和终体积分数为10%的DMSO)以体积比为1∶2的比例混合,以三步法降温方式冷冻保存,并在30 ℃水浴短时迅速复苏,该技术方法为本研究筛选到的最优刺参精子冷冻保存方法;与本研究中其他冷冻技术方法相比,应用该优选方法冷冻保存的刺参精子在复苏后精子活率最大(19.00±4.00)%、快速运动时间最长(1 178.67 s±14.57 s)、寿命最久(2 817.33 s±93.76 s);应用该优选方法冷冻保存72、120、408 h的精子复苏后受精率可达70%以上(精子与卵子数量比为1×106∶1),受精的卵囊孵化率可达到50%。研究表明,本研究中筛选获得的冷冻保存液配方及其冷冻保存方法比较适宜刺参精子的长期冷冻保存,具有应用于生产实践的潜力。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
赵谭军
尹文露
邹炀
刘丽
宋坚
常亚青
湛垚垚
关键词:  刺参  精子  低温冷冻保存  孵化率    
Abstract: In this study, cryopreservation steps, cryopreservation solution, sperm to cryopreservation solution ratio and thawing temperature were investigated attempting to obtain an optimal cryopreservation technique for sperm of sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus. Twenty-seven cryopreservation solutions (Aj-1 to Aj-27) were made up containing final concentrations of cryopreservation agents [dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), glycerol (Gly) or 1,2 propylene glycol (1,2 -G)] of 5%, 10% and 15% and semen of the sea cucumber was cooled down in 3 methods including equilibrated for 5 min at 4 ℃, then to -80 ℃ for a night, and final liquid nitrogen storage; equilibrated for 5 min at 4 ℃, then equilibrated at -20 ℃, -80 ℃ for a night, and final liquid nitrogen storage; and three steps: for 15 min above surface of liquid nitrogen, for 5 min on surface of liquid nitrogen, and final liquid nitrogen storage to screen the optimal cryopreservation steps. Cryopreservation was carried out at different proportions of sperm and cryopreservation solution (volume fraction). After 48 h of cryopreservation, sperm thawing was conducted at 37 ℃ or 30 ℃ water bath, and the optimal cryopreservation solution, sperm to cryopreservation solution ratio and thawing temperature were screened based on the sperm motility, rapid movement time and life span. The results showed that the optimal cryopreservation of sperm of sea cucumber was observed under the conditions of mixture of the sperm with Aj-20 sperm cryopreservation solution (12 g/L glucose, 7 g/L sodium chloride, 0.7 g/L potassium chloride, 5 g/L trehalose, 0.1 g/L anhydrous calcium chloride and final concentration containing 10% DMSO prepared with pure water) in a ratio of 1∶2 (volume fraction), and then the mixture of sperm and cryopreservation solution were cryopreserved by using the three-step method. The cryopreserved sperm of sea cucumber were well recovered by shortly incubated in water bath at 30 ℃, with the maximal sperm viability (19.00±4.00)%, the longest rapid movement time (1 178.67 s±14.57 s), and the longest life span (2 817.33 s±93.76 s) in thawed sperm of sea cucumber from cryopreservation using the optimal cryopreservation technical condition, compared with other cryopreservation technical conditions. Further experiment demonstrated that the fertilization rate of sperm cryopreserved for 72, 120 and 408 h was more than 70% and the blastula hatching rate of fertilized eggs with sperm cryopreserved 72, 120 and 408 h reached more than 50%, respectively, indicating that the optimal technique screened in this study is suitable for long-term cryopreservation of sperm of sea cucumber.
Key words:  Apostichopus japonicus    sperm    cryopreservation    hatching rate
                    发布日期:  2021-03-14      期的出版日期:  2021-03-14
中图分类号:  S 917.4  
基金资助: 国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFD0900105)
引用本文:    
赵谭军, 尹文露, 邹炀, 刘丽, 宋坚, 常亚青, 湛垚垚. 刺参精子冷冻保存方法研究[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2021, 36(1): 57-65.
ZHAO Tanjun, YIN Wenlu, ZOU Yang, LIU Li, SONG Jian, CHANG Yaqing, ZHAN Yaoyao?. Cryopreservation method of sperm of sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus. Journal of Dalian Ocean University, 2021, 36(1): 57-65.
链接本文:  
https://xuebao.dlou.edu.cn/CN/10.16535/j.cnki.dlhyxb.2020-034  或          https://xuebao.dlou.edu.cn/CN/Y2021/V36/I1/57
[1] 王涵, 王浩娜, 赵业. 刺参肠道组织结构及消化酶活性分析[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2022, 37(5): 823-829.
[2] 马得友, 于莲莲, 林威港, 汪成粱, 丁君, 常亚青. 刺参Wnt9基因克隆、组织分布及在胚胎发育中的表达分析[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2022, 37(3): 394-402.
[3] 王研, 高思祺, 匡倩瑶, 刘怡宁, 田燚?. 刺参3个盐度相关microRNA及预测靶基因的表达模式分析[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2022, 37(2): 212-220.
[4] 李成华. 刺参腐皮综合征发生的分子调控机制研究进展[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2021, 36(3): 355-373.
[5] 韩峰, 骆小年, 段友健, 罗超, 缪云亮, 曾永聪. Na+、K+、Ca2+、葡萄糖、pH、温度对北方须鳅精子活力的影响[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2021, 36(3): 462-469.
[6] 韩亚伦, 魏金亮, 崔洲平, 张健, 张伟杰, 温斌, 常亚青, 孙志惠. 母源因子boule在光棘球海胆性腺中的表达与定位[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2021, 36(2): 214-221.
[7] 时嘉赓, 冯艳微, 姜绪, 刘相全. 不同藻类与混养比例对刺参与马粪海胆生长、体成分和消化酶活性的影响[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2020, 35(4): 509-515.
[8] 张莹, 齐鑫, 王孝杰, 李键爽, 吕里康, 姚一甲, 温海深. 许氏平鲉精子超微结构及超低温冷冻对其形态的影响[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2020, 35(3): 355-359.
[9] 白伟, 吴香莹, 左然涛, 常亚青. 饲料中添加不同海藻对刺参幼参生长、免疫、消化及营养组成的影响[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2020, 35(2): 169-176.
[10] 李静, 刘佳亮, 曹学彬, 王福辰, 李君华, 郑龙华, 郭治诚, 孙路平, 刘石林. 光照对白刺参、青刺参和紫刺参生长、消化及免疫的影响[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2020, 35(2): 184-189.
[11] 陈雷、, 姚锋, 唐爽, 郭良勇, 王珊, 方蕾, 秦玉雪, 尹增强, 侯林. 刺参多功能表皮生长因子6 (megf6) cDNA克隆及在肠再生过程中的表达分析[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2020, 35(2): 239-246.
[12] 包鹏云, 李璐瑶, 徐哲, 陈炜, 丁鉴锋, 马悦欣. 海洋红酵母H26对刺参幼参生长、免疫指标和肠道菌群的影响[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2019, 34(5): 615-622.
[13] 曹学彬, 王福辰, 刘佳亮, 李静, 王俊杰, 李君华, 张志伟, 刘石林. 刺参速生耐高温品系生长性能及高温期摄食性能分析[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2019, 34(5): 623-628.
[14] 赵小然, 李艳, 王莉芬, 常亚青, 王斌. 刺参体腔细胞表面抗原分类及体壁组织中免疫细胞的研究[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2019, 34(4): 470-474.
[15] 林青, 张东升, 魏亚南, 孙广伟, 雷兆霖, 陈济丰, 郭超, 周玮. 3种水质调控方式对刺参池塘浮游植物种群结构的影响[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2019, 34(4): 566-572.
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed