Please wait a minute...

大连海洋大学学报  2021, Vol. 36 Issue (6): 910-919    DOI: 10.16535/j.cnki.dlhyxb.2021-008
  |
基于高通量测序和形态学鉴定的马来西亚马塘红树林区浮游动物多样性分析
张金勇,高养春,Amir Shah Ruddin Md Sah,Aileen TAN Shau-Hwai,Norlaila Binti Mohd Zanuri,李宏俊
1.国家海洋环境监测中心 海洋生态室,辽宁 大连 116023; 2.School of Biological Sciences,Universiti Sains Malaysia,Penang 11800,Malaysia; 3. Centre For Marine & Coastal Studies,Universiti Sains Malaysia,Penang 11800,Malaysia
Diversity analysis of zooplankton in Matang Mangrove Reserve in Malaysia by high-throughput sequencing and morphological identification methods
ZHANG Jinyong, GAO Yangchun, Amir Shah Ruddin Md Sah, Aileen TAN Shau-Hwai,Norlaila Binti Mohd Zanuri, LI Hongjun1*
1.Marine Ecology Department, National Marine Environmental Monitoring Center, Dalian 116023, China; 2.School of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang 11800, Malaysia; 3.Centre For Marine & Coastal Studies, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang 11800, Malaysia
下载:  HTML  PDF (12363KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 为评价DNA宏条形码(DNA metabarcoding)技术在海洋生物多样性监测中的应用潜力,本研究中采集了马来西亚马塘红树林保护区(Matang Mangrove Reserve,Malaysia)10个站位(SO1~SO10)浮游动物样品,分别采用宏条形码和形态学鉴定方法分析了浮游动物群落组成和结构。结果表明:以18S rDNA V4 区为标志基因的宏条形码方法共鉴定出浮游动物25门88目138属249个操作分类单元(operational taxonomic units, OTUs),而借助光学显微镜的形态学方法仅鉴定出2门6目13属;利用形态学方法鉴定出来的大部分类别(门100%、目83%、属54%)同时也能用宏条形码方法鉴定出来,而宏条形码分子方法鉴定出的大部分类别(门92%、目94%、属95%)却未能利用形态学方法鉴定出来;宏条形码方法根据热点图样本相似性聚类树可将10组浮游动物样本划分为3类(在门和目水平上),即第Ⅰ类(SO1、SO2、SO3和SO6)、第Ⅱ类(SO4、SO7、SO8、SO9和SO10)和第Ⅲ类(SO5),但在属分类水平上,SO4从第Ⅱ类站位划归到了第Ⅰ类中。研究表明:比较两种方法,宏条形码方法不但具有鉴定效率高、花费较低等优点,而且能得到更多的浮游动物种类和丰富度信息;随着DNA宏条形码技术体系的不断完善,数据库不断更新,使得DNA条形码技术的准确性更高,其将在浮游生物多样性评价中具有较高的应用潜力。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
张金勇
高养春
Amir Shah Ruddin Md Sah
Aileen TAN Shau-Hwai
Norlaila Binti Mohd Zanuri
李宏俊
关键词:  浮游动物  群落结构  DNA宏条形码  18S rDNA V4  马塘红树林保护区    
Abstract: In order to evaluate the application potential of DNA metabarcoding technology in marine biodiversity monitoring, the composition and structure of zooplankton community were analyzed in samples collected from 10 stations (SO1-SO10) in Matang Mangrove Reserve in Malaysia by metabarcoding and morphological identification methods in August of 2018. A total of 249 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) belonging to 25 phyla, 88 orders and 138 genera was identified using the metabarcoding methods with 18S rDNA V4 area as the marker gene. However, under a light microscope, only 2 phyla, 6 orders and 13 genera were identified by morphological methods. The most taxa including 100% phylum, 83% order and 54% genus were observed under morphological methods, while they were also identified using metabarcoding methods. On the contrary, the most taxa including 92% phylum, 94% order and 95% genus identified using metabarcoding methods were not identified by morphological methods. The 10 samples of zooplankton collected from the 10 stations were divided into 3 categories (at the level of phylum and order levels) based on the similarity cluster tree of heatmap diagram by metabarcoding methods: category I (SO1, SO2, SO3 and SO6), category Ⅱ (SO4, SO7, SO8, SO9 and SO10) and category Ⅲ (SO5). But at the level of genus levels, SO4 was classified from category Ⅱ to category Ⅰ. Comparison of the two methods revealed that the DNA metabarcoding technology was characterized by the high identification efficiency, low cost, and more zooplankton species and richness information. The accuracy of DNA barcoding technology will be improved with the continuous improvement of the DNA metabarcoding technology system and updating of the database, and will have a broader application potential in the evaluation of plankton biodiversity.
Key words:  zooplankton    community structure    DNA metabarcoding    18S rDNA V4    Matang Mangrove Reserve
               出版日期:  2021-12-20      发布日期:  2021-12-20      期的出版日期:  2021-12-20
中图分类号:  S 931.1  
基金资助: 中国-东盟海上合作基金(全球变化背景下南中国海近海生态系统监测与保护管理示范);国家海洋环境监测中心博士科研启动基金
引用本文:    
张金勇, 高养春, Amir Shah Ruddin Md Sah, Aileen TAN Shau-Hwai, Norlaila Binti Mohd Zanuri, 李宏俊. 基于高通量测序和形态学鉴定的马来西亚马塘红树林区浮游动物多样性分析[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2021, 36(6): 910-919.
ZHANG Jinyong, GAO Yangchun, Amir Shah Ruddin Md Sah, Aileen TAN Shau-Hwai, Norlaila Binti Mohd Zanuri, LI Hongjun. Diversity analysis of zooplankton in Matang Mangrove Reserve in Malaysia by high-throughput sequencing and morphological identification methods. Journal of Dalian Ocean University, 2021, 36(6): 910-919.
链接本文:  
https://xuebao.dlou.edu.cn/CN/10.16535/j.cnki.dlhyxb.2021-008  或          https://xuebao.dlou.edu.cn/CN/Y2021/V36/I6/910
[1] 刘鹏飞, 景丽, 任泷, 匡箴, 詹政军, 胡长岁, 徐东坡. 固城湖鱼类群落结构现状及其与环境因子的关系[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2022, 37(5): 841-849.
[2] 王东伟, 龚江, 杨晓曦, 赵伟, 周彦锋. 淮河荆涂峡鲤、 长吻鮠国家级水产种质资源保护区浮游植物群落结构的时空格局及影响因子[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2022, 37(4): 658-311.
[3] 付菲雨 , 韩霈武 , 方舟, 刘必林. 西北太平洋春、冬季浮游动物优势种水平分布与影响因子的关系[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2022, 37(3): 489-496.
[4] 卫鹏, 毕相东, 戴伟, 张达娟, 李宛津, 董少杰. 淡水养殖池塘微型和超微型浮游植物的群落结构组成[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2022, 37(1): 113-119.
[5] 白海锋, 孔飞鹤, 王怡睿, 宋进喜, 曹叶琳, 蒋晓辉. 北洛河流域浮游动物群落结构时空特征及其与环境因子相关性[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2021, 36(5): 785-795.
[6] 隗陈征, 刘鹰, 任纪龙, 马洪婧, 吴英海, 韩蕊, . 曝气条件对铁基复合填料生物滤器脱氮性能及菌群变化的影响[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2021, 36(3): 470-477.
[7] 俞松立, 王咏雪, 韩晓凤, 章翊涵, 来洪运, 章凯, 张丽源, 水柏年. 三门湾海域渔业生物群落结构及营养级变化特征[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2021, 36(3): 478-487.
[8] 徐晟云, 陈昆慈, 罗青, 刘海洋, 欧密, 上官清, 赵建. 基于16S rRNA高通量测序的鳢肠道微生物群落结构研究[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2020, 35(5): 693-700.
[9] 庞雨佳, 赵文, 魏杰, 苑俊杰, 尹东鹏, 王安璞, 谢在刚. 桓仁水库和碧流河水库浮游生物群落结构及水环境特征的比较研究[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2020, 35(3): 407-416.
[10] 郭楠楠, 李丹丹, 陈曦, 齐延凯, 宋超, 范立民, 裘丽萍, 孟顺龙, 陈家长. 春秋两季西大洋水库生态修复示范区浮游植物群落结构特征[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2020, 35(3): 417-423.
[11] 董雅欠, 赵文, 季世琛, 魏杰, 李博, 时晓. 北京潮白河水系浮游动物群落结构特征及水质评价[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2020, 35(3): 424-431.
[12] 王泽斌, 张树林, 张达娟, 李鑫, 孔欣. 天津近海鱼类月间种类组成及变化[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2019, 34(5): 733-738.
[13] 林青, 张东升, 魏亚南, 孙广伟, 雷兆霖, 陈济丰, 郭超, 周玮. 3种水质调控方式对刺参池塘浮游植物种群结构的影响[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2019, 34(4): 566-572.
[14] 张良成, 李凡, 吕振波, 徐炳庆. 莱州湾虾虎鱼类资源分布及群落结构研究[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2019, 34(4): 588-594.
[15] 陶峰, 刘凯, 蔺丹清, 张家路, 尤洋. 安庆市西江浮游植物群落多样性时空格局[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2019, 34(2): 239-246.
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed